Wednesday, October 7, 2009

The Wizarding World of Christianity

When the movie Harry Potter first came out and ever since, there have been many Christians who have condemned it as evil and something that should not be read or watched due to its blatant use of magic, wizardry, and witchcraft. However, I would say that Christianity uses its own particular brand of 'white magic' within its rituals and traditions. To say to the modern Christian that Christianity as a religious whole incorporates forms of magic, incantation, and superstition would likely be an intolerable insult. To the Christian mind these things are in the list of forbidden practices that lead to bondage, allowing the devil to gain a foothold in the life of the practitioner. However, upon closer examination of what occurs in modern Christianity, as well as within the Israelite tradition, and even amongst the disciples in the Gospels and Acts, I surmise that such practices do exist today, and come from a long tradition of use from the inception of Israelite religion as well as Christian religion.

This is not surprising really as any religion in and of itself must contain a degree of superstition. The definition of superstition according to Webster is as follows.

1 a : a belief or practice resulting from ignorance, fear of the unknown, trust in magic or chance, or a false conception of causation b : an irrational abject attitude of mind toward the supernatural, nature, or God resulting from superstition2 : a notion maintained despite evidence to the contrary

A belief in God, the spiritual realm, and the influences that these spiritual forces can and do have on the natural world, inevitably lead to the use of magic and incantation in an attempt to control these forces (in Christianity, it is used to control the evil forces in the world. I have argued elsewhere that prayer, in some cases, is a form of trying to control the force of good that is God) Thus, any religion which acknowledges the spiritual realm and its influence on the world around us will have an element of magic to control that spiritual realm. Christianity is no different.

Let’s start by examining some incantations from Mesopotamian literature. When I use the term incantation, I mean it in the following sense: a use of spells or verbal charms spoken or sung as a part of a ritual of magic; a written or recited formula of words designed to produce a particular effect (Webster’s Dictionary). The incantations that we will be looking at fit this particular definition. The Mesopotamians loved magic and incantations. Countless cuneiform tablets have been discovered which display various aspects of what incantations were used for. They had incantations against demons, an adversary in a lawsuit, an angry man, bile, the evil eye, eye disease, fever, flatulence (yes that’s right, you could say a little diddy and get rid of your excess gas), headache, infertility, nurses harmful to children, phantoms, scorpions, toothache, witchcraft, and it goes on like this. What follows is an incantation against Lamashtu, a demon known for snatching babies and causing miscarriages and still-born children.

She is furious, she is fierce, she is uncanny, she has an awful glamour, and she is a she-wolf, the daughter of Anu!

Her feet are those of Anzu, her hands are unclean, the face of a ravening lion is her face. She came up from the reed bed, her hair askew, her loincloth torn away. She stalks the cattle’s tracks, she dogs the sheep’s tracks, her hands are gory with flesh and blood. She comes in the window, slithering like a serpent, She enters a house, she leaves a house. “Bring me your sons that I may suckle them, and your daughters, that I may nurse them, Let me put my breast in your daughters’ mouths!”

Ea his father heard her, “O daughter of Anu, instead of trying to be the nursemaid of humankind, Instead of your hands being gory with flesh and blood, Instead of entering a house, leaving a house, accept from the traveling merchant a cloak and provisions, accept from the smith bracelets as befit your hands and feet, accept from the jeweller an earring as befits your ears, accept from the gem cutter a carnelian as befits your neck, accept from the woodworker a comb, a distaff, and your garment pin.”

I conjure you by Anu your father, Antu your mother. I conjure you by Ea, who created your name!

Here the demon Lamashtu is controlled via this incantation. She is tempted away from the house of the expectant mother with the idea of varied material goods. The heart of the incantation comes at the end where the performer of this ritual controls Lamashtu by mentioning the names of higher gods in the pantheon, namely Anu, Antu, and Ea, whom Lamashtu is presumed to respect and have to obey.

The Israelite religion displays a similar, although different, form of magic against a force not unlike Lamashtu during the epic of the plagues of Egypt. It occurs as protection against the destroyer which Yahweh allows to go throughout Egypt and kill all first-born children.

Exodus 11: 21-23
Then Moses called all the elders of Israel and said to them, “Go, select lambs for your families, and slaughter the Passover lamb. Take a bunch of hyssop, dip it in the blood that is in the basin, and touch the lintel and the two doorposts with the blood in the basin. None of you shall go outside the door of your house until morning. For the Lord will pass through to strike down the Egyptians; when he sees the blood on the lintel and on the two doorposts, the Lord will pass over that door and will not allow the destroyer to enter your houses to strike you down.

Now presumably, if God was indeed all knowing, he should have had the wherewithal to know who his chosen people were and who the Egyptians were without this bloody mess all over the door-posts. Yet, this was required for some reason in order to repel the destroyer from coming in to the house. This is a form of magic, resulting from superstition. This passage, like the Mesopotamian incantation against Lamashtu, demonstrates the use of magic to control those spiritual forces which cannot be seen and are not of this natural world. Why they thought that putting blood on the door posts would help, or that certain specific words recited in a particular way would be able to control those evil forces may never be understood fully to the modern reader, yet what is certain is that they felt certain that performing these rituals would ensure the control of the malevolent force. In the case of the Israelites, there is not really a theology of angels and demons per se until they came into contact with Babylonian religion during the exile where it may be argued that the idea of angels and demons was assimilated into Israelite religion. Therefore, it is difficult to find with any certainty magic or incantations against demons or evil gods specifically. However, there is another instance where magic is used against a sickness or ailment. It is in Numbers 21 where we first encounter the bronze serpent.

4 They traveled from Mount Hor along the route to the Red Sea,to go around Edom. But the people grew impatient on the way; 5 they spoke against God and against Moses, and said, "Why have you brought us up out of Egypt to die in the desert? There is no bread! There is no water! And we detest this miserable food!"
6 Then the LORD sent venomous snakes among them; they bit the people and many Israelites died. 7 The people came to Moses and said, "We sinned when we spoke against the LORD and against you. Pray that the LORD will take the snakes away from us." So Moses prayed for the people.
8 The LORD said to Moses, "Make a snake and put it up on a pole; anyone who is bitten can look at it and live." 9 So Moses made a bronze snake and put it up on a pole. Then when anyone was bitten by a snake and looked at the bronze snake, he lived.

Karen Joins interprets this use of the bronze snake as “sympathetic magic”.

“the restoration of life, the most prominent element in the tradition of Moses and the bronze serpent seems to be that of sympathetic magic- the belief that the fate of an object or person can be governed by the manipulation of its exact image. Thereby a representation of a noxious creature could best drive off that creature, and an adversary could most effectively be controlled by the manipulation of his exact image.”

As such, it is not necessarily by the power of God alone that the Israelites could be healed, but through this bronze serpent, a source of magic that can repel the snakes. The Mesopotamians also had incantations against various dangerous animals, including snakes and scorpions, which could be used to repel the animals in question.

I seize the mouth of all snakes, even the viper, Serpent that cannot be conjured:
The alabaster burrower, the fish-snake with rainbow eyes
The eel, the hissing snake, The hisser, the snake at the window.
It came in by a crevice, It went out by a drain. It struck the gazelle while it slept, It secreted itself in a withered oak.
The snake lurks in a roof beam, The serpent lurks in wool.
The serpent has six mouths, seven tongues, Seven are the poisonous vapors of its heart.
It is bushy of hair, horrible of feature, Its eyes are frightful.
Bubbles ooze from its maw, Its spittle cleaves stone.

Here, “seized the mouth” is interpreted as “capture by spell”. In the Mesopotamian view, control of the mouth expresses absolute control. Thus, in similar ways, both Israelite and Mesopotamian religion demonstrate an example of magic used to control a malevolent animal, in this case the snake. The Israelites used an image of the snake as sympathetic magic, and the Mesopotamians used an incantation which may have been used alongside some kind of ritual.
What follows here is another Mesopotamian example of an incantation. This particular one is a conjuring against evil spirits, specifically, “The Seven”, which is a group of demons which eludes our specific knowledge.

They are seven, they are seven,
They are seven in the springs of the depths,
They are seven, adorned in heaven.
They grew up in the springs of the depths, in the cella.
They are not male, they are not female,
They are drifting phantoms,
They take no wife, they beget no son.
They know neither sparing of life nor mercy,
They heed neither prayers nor entreaties.
They are steeds that grew up in the mountains,
They are the evil ones of Ea,
They are the prefects of the gods.
They loiter in the side streets to make trouble on the highway.
They are evil, they are evil!
They are seven, they are seven, they are twice seven!
Be conjured by heaven, be conjured by the netherworld!

In this incantation, the evil spirits are in some way connected with Ea, one of the highest ranking gods in the Mesopotamian pantheon. In a way, they are very reminiscent of the fallen angels of Christianity in that they are connected with heaven, yet are now evil. The number seven likely does not refer to a specific number of these evil spirits, but rather is a number representing completion, or in other words, a large group. This incantation is meant as a conjuring of these evil spirits in order to protect the person speaking it. Compare this to Psalm 91.

Psalm 91
Security of the One Who Trusts in the LORD.
1He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High
Will abide in the shadow of the Almighty.
2I will say to the LORD, "My refuge and my fortress,
My God, in whom I trust!"
3For it is He who delivers you from the snare of the trapper
And from the deadly pestilence.
4He will cover you with His pinions,
And under His wings you may seek refuge;
His faithfulness is a shield and bulwark.
You will not be afraid of the terror by night,
Or of the arrow that flies by day;
6Of the pestilence that stalks in darkness,
Or of the destruction that lays waste at noon.
7A thousand may fall at your side
And ten thousand at your right hand,
But it shall not approach you.
8You will only look on with your eyes
And see the recompense of the wicked.
9For you have made the LORD, my refuge,
Even the Most High, your dwelling place.
10No evil will befall you,
Nor will any plague come near your tent.
11For He will give His angels charge concerning you,
To guard you in all your ways.
12They will bear you up in their hands,
That you do not strike your foot against a stone.
13You will tread upon the lion and cobra,
The young lion and the serpent you will trample down.
14"Because he has loved Me, therefore I will deliver him;
I will set him securely on high, because he has known My name.
15"He will call upon Me, and I will answer him;
I will be with him in trouble;
I will rescue him and honor him.
16"With a long life I will satisfy him
And let him see My salvation."

It has been argued that the thousand referred to in verse 7 refer to evil spirits comparable to the ones mentioned in the Mesopotamian incantation. It has also been argued by scholars that some of the psalms, such as Psalm 91, may have been used within the context of an incantation ritual. Given the ritualistic form and structure of many of the Psalms, and the evasive context in which they were recited, it is not entirely unlikely that they could have been used in this context. However, the evidence is interpreted almost exclusively upon opinion and this cannot be proven with any certainty but I would not exclude the possibility. It may be argued that perhaps some were used in a magical sense, but certainly not all.

In Genesis 30 we find a rather curious instance with Jacob who uses some sort of magic in order to create striped, speckled, and spotted sheep. The method involved peeling the bark from rods of poplar and almond trees to make them appear striped. He then placed by and in the troughs where the sheep drank. If the sheep mated there, they produced striped, speckled and spotted offspring.

Genesis 30
37Then Jacob took fresh rods of poplar and almond and plane trees, and peeled white stripes in them, exposing the white which was in the rods.
38He set the rods which he had peeled in front of the flocks in the gutters, even in the watering troughs, where the flocks came to drink; and they mated when they came to drink.
39So the flocks mated by the rods, and the flocks brought forth striped, speckled, and spotted.
40Jacob separated the lambs, and made the flocks face toward the striped and all the black in the flock of Laban; and he put his own herds apart, and did not put them with Laban's flock.
41Moreover, whenever the stronger of the flock were mating, Jacob would place the rods in the sight of the flock in the gutters, so that they might mate by the rods;
42but when the flock was feeble, he did not put them in; so the feebler were Laban's and the stronger Jacob's.
43So the man became exceedingly prosperous, and had large flocks and female and male servants and camels and donkeys.
There is no mention of God being the aider in this instance, and it is clearly ridiculous to try and prove scientifically that this method will produce striped and spotted animals. As such, the last option is that this was some form of magical ritual apparently common enough to be recognized within this literary work by the reader.

We will now be taking a look at a couple of examples of magic and incantation that are not in the Bible, but are of extreme value in understanding the practice of the Israelites. Magic and incantation was not unfamiliar to the Israelites. Below is drawing of an amulet from the 7th century BCE.



On the reverse side is a Hebrew inscription containing an incantation against demons




The text above was discovered in Northern Syria. The symbols on the front of the amulet are very common to Israelite tradition including the Cherub (winged lion). What is interesting is that the inscription itself is in pure Biblical Hebrew. This is an incantation against Night demons, or as some other scholars have suggested, against demons who would snatch away a child from the womb or during child birth (compare to the role of Lamashtu and the Mesopotamian incantation cited above). With evidence of this incantation being written in Hebrew, it can be deduced that such things were not uncommon to Israelite thought. Although this incantation is in the name of Baal, it does demonstrate a knowledge of magic and incantation amongst the Israelites.

This next example is from the Qumran texts (Dead sea scrolls) and dates between 150BCE and 70 AD. The text, labelled 4Q560, is an incantation against a demon, named Beelzebub, utilizing the form of conjuring by invoking the name of the deity, in this case Yahweh.

Column i
1. ...Beel]zebub, you/to you[...
2. ...]the midwife, the punishment of childbearers, an evil visitant, a de[mon . . .
3. ... I adjure you all who en]ter into the body, the male Wasting-demon and the female Wasting-demon
4. ... I adjure you by the name of YHWH, "He who re]moves iniquity and transgression,' O Fever and Chills and Chest Pain
5. ...and forbidden to disturb by night in dreams or by da]y in sleep, the male Shrine-spirit and the female Shrine-spirit, breacher-demons (?) of
6. ...w]icked...[ ]..[ ]l[ ]
7. ...]...[
8....
Column ii
1....
2. before h[im...
3. and...
4. before him and... [
5. And I, O spirit, adjure [you that you...
6. I adjure you, O spirit, [that you...
7. On the earth, in clouds [...
8....

This text is important for several reasons, one of which is that this is among the earliest examples of a Hebrew text which uses a personal name for a demon, in this case Beelzebub. Once again the demon in question in this text bears a remarkable resemblance to that of Lamashtu, the demon goddess who snatches away children. However, in this text, instead of conjuring the demon in the name of Anu, it is Yahweh’s name which is used to control the demon. This text also has an element of magical healing involved as well with mention of fever, chills, and chest pains. It is through the use of incantation that the user of this spell believed the recipient would be kept from, or healed from, these illnesses. This text demonstrates that at least the Qumran community had a use of magic and incantations within the context of their religion of Yahweh. It is likely that the text above, written on a scroll, was a master copy of a spell that was copied onto magical amulets or plaques which had a superstitious apotropaic function, such as the plaques which we will be studying next.

Before we move on to the next artifact, it is important to take a look at Numbers 6:22-27 which contains the famous words of the priestly blessing as dictated to Moses by Yahweh to in order to bless the Israelites.

22 The LORD said to Moses, 23 "Tell Aaron and his sons, 'This is how you are to bless the Israelites. Say to them:
24 " ' "The LORD bless you and keep you;
25 the LORD make his face shine upon you and be gracious to you;
26 the LORD turn his face toward you and give you peace." '
27 "So they will put my name on the Israelites, and I will bless them."

At first glance, if we see these verses through the eyes of our current Christian understanding, this is simply a blessing as we have come to utilize it. However, I have recently wondered to myself, what does it mean exactly when we ask God to bless him or her, or bless me? Are we asking for material goods? Are we asking for God to give some sort of emotional satisfaction or stability to the person we are asking him to bless? Does God blessing us mean that our lives will be all good and no harm will come to us? I think the whole asking for a blessing from God has become a quick way of putting something in a prayer that makes one sound holy or spiritual when in fact we don’t really even know the implications of what we are asking for or what we truly mean. I would argue that the priestly blessing, as seen in the chapter above, was used as an incantation of sorts in an apotropaic fashion (as a way to ward off evil). In the least, regardless of the original intention of the blessing, I will attempt to demonstrate that there were Israelites in the 7th century BCE who understood this blessing as an incantation.

On a side note (although intricately related), it is important to understand that whenever one takes the Bible as a proof for anything (in this case I have used it to demonstrate the use of magic in Israelite culture), that the Bible is only the literary representation of the religious practices and rites of the Israelites. It is becoming more apparent to scholars (at least those concerned with studying accurate history as much as is possible) that there must be an interdisciplinary effort between the textual and archaeological resources available to us in order to reconstruct an accurate model of Israelite religion. Ron Tappy, in his review of “Sacred Time, Sacred Place: Archaeology and the Religion of Israel”, puts it as follows:

“After opening his contribution by noting that the last fifteen years have witnessed "the beginning of the interdisciplinary dialogue that... is crucial," W. G. Dever contends that "the pursuit has been largely in vain" (p. 11). He then offers a sharp critique of past philo- logical and theological approaches to Israelite religion. While its stress on empirical data and comparative method gave philology an objective, academic edge over other reasons for studying Israelite religion (orthodox belief, personal piety, etc.), the discipline's "fundamental flaw" lay in its "positivist presuppositions." The burgeoning discipline assumed that the biblical texts preserved an accurate portrait of early Israelite religion and that philology would lead us to a correct reading and understanding of the texts. Yet "literature is not life but, rather, the product of the intellectual and literary imagination of a creative few" (p. 13). Working from texts alone, then, scholars recover only a Sitz im Literatur, not a reliable Sitz im Leben for Israelite religious thought and practice.

“For Dever, the biblical theology movement has devalued the history and religion of an- cient Israel by remaining confessional in character, seeking only to establish a foundation for modern belief, stressing typology, and misappropriating the texts "as simply the starting point of a Vergegenwtirtigung." That is, in proclaiming a salvation-history, the "story" re- ceives more stress than the facts, and the desire to know what really happened in antiquity is displaced by an acceptance of the biblical writers' interpretations, which become the basis for our own confessional recitals. Theology, Dever says, falls victim to its own need to locate ideological unity within the texts and to identify a "normative" religion.”

That being said, I would like to make some sort of concerted effort to utilize material remains as well as textual evidence to support my views. We will look at two plaques, or amulets that were discovered in 1979 that contained the priestly blessing and which scholars have come to the conclusion were intended as magical implements to ward of evil. The amulets themselves were discovered at Kitef Hinom, a site in Jerusalem.






The amulets were found inside a burial chamber in a repository amongst other artefacts deposited there. The plaques are silver with the letters scratched onto the surface. They are also relatively small (Ketef Hinnom I=27x97mm, Ketef Hinnom II= 11x39.2mm). The script is very difficult to read as it is scratched into the surface, not written with ink on a paper. The script itself is rather cursive in nature, as though it was written quickly. “Moreover, they are executed in a flowing cursive script that might best be described as casual even to the point of being ‘negligent’ (Barkay 1992: 169). In all likelihood, this is because the inscriptions were never meant to be seen again; that is, like the inscriptions in mezuzot and tefillin, once written and rolled up, they no longer really act as the components of documents intended to be read. Rather, their function is apotropaic and/or sanctifying; the inscriptions in these plaques exist as amulets to give their wearers protection against evil in the presence of holiness.” (Basor 334, pg.46) Below is a drawing of Ketef Hinnom I followed by a translation.


"1 ...]YHW
...
3the grea[t... who keeps]
4the covenant and
5[G]raciousness toward those who love [him] and (alt: those who love [hi]m;)
6those who keep [his commandments...
...].
8the Eternal? [...].
9[the?] blessing more than any
10[sna]re and more than Evil. "
11For redemption is in him.
12For YHWH
13is our restorer [and]
14rock. May YHWH bles[s]
15you and 16[may he] keep you.
17[May] YHWH make
18[his face] shine.... "

Below is a drawing of Ketef Hinnom II followed by the translation.




1[For PN, (the son/daughter of) xxxx]lh/hu. May h[e]/
2sh[e] be blessed by Yahweh,
3the warrior [or: helper] and
4and the rebuker of
5[E]vil: May Yahweh bless you,
6keep you.
7May Yahweh make
8his face shine
9upon you and
10grant you p[ea]ce.

The phrase in Ketef Hinnom II which states Yahweh as the rebuker of evil, is indicative of the use of these amulets in an apotropaic manner. That combined with the location being within a burial repository (which may or may not be connected with a cult of the dead), and the cursive script which no one was really meant to read, has led to a consensus amongst scholars who have studied these plaques, that they were indeed meant to be used as a magical implement, or incantation to ward off evil. With the presence of the priestly blessing on these amulets, it is safe to assume that the famous passage from Numbers and elsewhere in the Old Testament had a function indicative of an incantation, or protective charm/spell.

It is safe to say then, from the preceding evidence, that the Israelites, before the coming of Christ, had a history of magic, superstition, and incantation. But what of the time after Christ came? Is there any indication there that such superstitions carried on into the Christian era? It is almost even more obvious and easier to see in the textual evidence in the gospels than it is in the Old Testament, if one has the eyes to recognize it. The primary focus which I would like to use for a comparative example is the formulaic invocation of a name (of the deity, in this case Jesus, or sometimes Beelzebub) to perform the miracle, in these cases, the exorcism. Jesus of course needs not invoke his own name to perform miracles, as he is God, but those who follow him, must use the formula, which bears striking resemblance to the incantations we saw earlier, by using Jesus name.

Matthew 7:22
22"Many will say to Me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?'
Matthew 9:34
34But the Pharisees were saying, "He casts out the demons by the ruler of the demons."
Matthew 12:27
27"If I by Beelzebul cast out demons, by whom do your sons cast them out? For this reason they will be your judges.
Mark 9:38
38John said to Him, "Teacher, we saw someone casting out demons in Your name, and we tried to prevent him because he was not following us."
Acts 4:10
let it be known to all of you and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead--by this name this man stands here before you in good health.

Acts 4: 29-30
29"And now, Lord, take note of their threats, and grant that Your bond-servants may speak Your word with all confidence,
30while You extend Your hand to heal, and signs and wonders take place through the name of Your holy servant Jesus."

Acts 16:18
She continued doing this for many days. But Paul was greatly annoyed, and turned and said to the spirit, "I command you in the name of Jesus Christ to come out of her!" And it came out at that very moment.
Acts 19
11God was performing extraordinary miracles by the hands of Paul,
12so that handkerchiefs or aprons were even carried from his body to the sick, and the diseases left them and the evil spirits went out.
13But also some of the Jewish exorcists, who went from place to place, attempted to name over those who had the evil spirits the name of the Lord Jesus, saying, "I adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preaches."

As mentioned before, in order for those who are not Jesus to command the demons, or to perform healing, it was necessary to do so using a type of formulaic command utilizing the name of Jesus. Although as Christians, we don’t normally classify these statements as incantations, they are, by comparison to other forms of commanding demons from the ‘pagan’ world, incantations. As well, there is textual evidence that an incantation was required in some instances for healing (Acts 4:10).

There is physical evidence that magic and incantations evolved into a well-developed system from the inception of Christianity to the 7th century A.D. What we see in the New Testament is but a twinkle of the notion of incantations; the starting point for Christian ‘magic’. By the 7th century, there are examples of formulaic conjurations utilizing the Christian formula placed onto material goods which formed an apotropaic function alike to the plaques mentioned above.
The Aramaic magical incantation bowls first began to be unearthed and published for study in 1853. These bowls, dating from 400 to 700 A.D. were produced mainly by Jewish ‘magicians’. They contained circular writing of various incantations against all sorts of varying evils such as demons, disease, sorcery, those who would bear someone ill will, etc. They were crafted by the magician, who then sold it to various clients who needed ‘protection’. Below is a picture of one such bowl.



There are many varying theories as to why the inscriptions were placed on bowls such as: they were meant to trap the evil spirit or demon in the bowl; one was meant to put water in the bowl, mix it with the ink and drink the concoction which would protect the user; they were to be used as amulets; they were used in some sort of divination using water (hydromancy). However, none of these theories can be proven directly as the texts themselves vary enough that each could be true for a given bowl, but not all of them. What is certain is that these bowls were made to ward off evil via the incantation placed on the bowl.

The incantations themselves have many general statements in them designed to insure the client protection from all angles of attack. “Notice, for example, the incantation against "Aramean black- arts, Jewish black-arts, Arabic black- arts, Persian black-arts, Indian black-arts, Greek black-arts, black- arts of the Romans, black-arts which are practiced in the seventy languages, either by woman or by man" (Text 49.9-10). This eclectic magician was making sure that no one harmed his client, not Christians (Arameans = Syrian Christians), Jews, Arabs (nomads here, not a religious designation), Zoroastrians (Persians), Indians, Greeks, or Romans. The ‘seventy languages’ represent all the languages known anywhere in the world, while ‘woman or man’ is clearly a merismus depicting totality, i.e., to include every person in the universe.” (Isbell, pg. 10) Those who bought these bowls were clearly superstitious and the producers of the bowls (who were great entrepreneurs) fulfilled this need to feel protected against the evil forces of the world. It was a form of ‘white magic’ to counter the evil, and black magic in the world.

Many of these texts quote Hebrew scripture within the incantation. There is one text which is made up only of quotes from the Hebrew Bible loosely connected and thrown together. “The most frequently quoted verse in the AMIB texts is Zech 3:2, which appears five times. ‘And YHWH said to Satan: May YHWH rebuke you, Satan, may YHWH who chose Jerusalem rebuke you. Is not this a fire-brand snatched from the fire?’” (Isbell, pg. 14) It is thought by some that there are references to the New Testament as well, although this is not certain. Below are some examples of the incantations found on these bowls.

Text 2
Again I am coming, I, Pabak the son of Kupitai, in the power of my own self, polished armor of iron on my body, my head of iron, my stature of [pure]1 fire. (2) I am clothed with the garment of Hermes, Dabya, and Mamlala2 and my power comes from the One who created heaven and earth. I have come and I have confronted (3) the evil haters and the potent adversaries. I have said to them: If you sin at all against 'Abuna the son of Geribta and 'Ibba the son of Zawita, I will enchant you with the spell (4) of the sea and the spell of Leviathan the sea-monster. If you sin at all against 'Abuna the son of Geribta, or against his wife and sons, I will bend the bow against you, (5) and I will stretch the bow-string against you. Again, at all against the household of Pabak, against his possessions, or against all the people of his household, by my own power,3 I, 'Abuna the son of Geribta -or against 'Ibba the son of Zawita -(6) will bring down upon you the ban, the prohibition, and the anathema which came down upon Mount Hermon and upon Leviathan the sea-monster and upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah. In order to subdue devils (7) am I coming, I, 'Abuna the son of Geribta, and all evil mysteries, and the tongue of impious pebble- charms. I have come and I have confronted them - the demons, the devils, the evil monsters, the idols,4 and the female destroyers standing arrayed in rows and encamped in camps.5

In this text Pabak, the author, is claiming the power himself to deal with these potential evils. However, he does allude to acts done by Yahweh (the defeat of Leviathan, Sodom and Gomorrah). Below is an example of an incantation done in the name of Yahweh.

A "Sealing" Text (Text 50)
Sealed and dou[bly-se]aled is the house of Zidin Sabor the son of 'EliSeba, with seventy knots, (2) with seventy bonds, with seventy seals, with the twisted chain, with ZWZMRY, with the signet-ring of Yokabarziwa the son of Rabbe, with the signet-ring (3) of Kasdi'el the mighty angel, the Prince of the Chaldeans, with the signet-ring of Michael the mighty angel, the Prince of the Law, with the signet-ring of Gabriel (4) the mighty angel, the Prince of Fire, with the signet-ring of 'Aspanadas-Diwa, the jinnee of King Solomon the son of David, and with the signet-ring of King Solomon the son of David, (5) (and with the signet-ring of King Solomon the Son of David), with the g[re]at seal of the Lord of the Universe whose knot cannot be untied and whose seal cannot be broken. Blessed art Thou, YHWH, God of Israel. Amen. Amen. Selah. (6) Again, sealed and doubly-sealed is the house of Zidin Sabor the son of 'EliSeba, with seventy knots, with seventy bonds, with seventy seals, with the twisted chain, with ZWZMRY, with the signet-ring of Yokabarziwa the son of Rabbe, (7) with the signet-ring [of] Kasdi['e]l [the mighty angel, the Prin]ce of the Chaldeans, with the sig[net]-ring of Michael the mighty angel, the Prince of the Law, with the signet-ring of Gabriel the mighty angel, the Prince of Fire, with the signet-ring (8) of 'Aspanadas-Diwa, the jinnee of King Solomon the so[n of D]avid, with the sig[net-ring] of King Solomon the son of David, and with the great seal [of] the Lord of the Uni- verse whose knot cannot be untied and whose seal cannot be broken. Blessed art Thou, YHWH, God of Israel. Amen. Amen. Selah.

Text 50 above mentions a variety of benevolent angels by name such as Kasdi’el, Michael, Gabriel, Aspanadas-Diwa. Angels, as the servants of Yahweh, also had the power to protect and as such, they were invoked via incantations. The incantation is repeated in the second half of the text as a way of “doubly sealing” the house of Zidin Sabor against evil.

The following text (text 9) is an incantation done in the name of Yahweh alone. It is also interesting as it mentions several demons by name and then ends with a catch all phrase to make sure that all demons will be conjured by the incantation. It is apparent that not only were there angels called by name, but the idea of demons with names and personalities was also very prevalent.

A Text in the Name of Yahweh (Text 9)
I am acting in Your name, YHWH the Great God. May this bowl be for the sealing of Hormizduk the daughter of Maduk. I adjure ........ (2) [e]vil, in the name of the Holy Agrabis, in the name of Yah Yah,' in the name of SP SP YHWH YHWH2 who removed His chariot to the Red Sea.. ... (3) David the Psalm of the Red Sea. Again, I adjure you by the One who caused His Shekinah to dwell in the temple of light and hail and His throne. .... (4) the exalted King. Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Depart! Depart! May he be removed even in the name of3 Michael and Gabriel the one who ..... (5) in the name of Sariel, in the name of Seraphiel, Suriel, and Sarsamiel and Gadriel, Peniel, Nahriel. And all blast-demons (6) and evil harmers whose names are recorded in this bowl and whose names I have not recorded in this bowl. Oh! (7) Oh! Depart! Sit there! And you will be cast down while sitting inside the fiery flames and the flame of fire. (8) Amen. Amen. Amen. Selah.

What I find interesting about the next incantation bowl, is the Christian formula used at the end which we, as modern Christians, are so familiar with.

Syriac Incantation
"Appointed is this (charm?), 'press,' and bond and besealment and warding of my house, of me Nuri daughter of Giloi, of her house, her husband and her sons and her daughters. And this is an equipment against every demon and devil, which are lodged in the house; the Strangler and the pains of childbirth, that they may flee whoever are in the house of Nuri d. of G. Amen, Amen, Selah. "In the name of these angels-faithful are they-Michael the angel, and Ruphael the angel-warders are they: Yohabiel and Barakiel the angel. The house-do you angels by your stroke protect my house, of me N. d. of G. Amen, Amen, Selah. In the name of Oran . In the name of the Father, in the name of the Son ........ [and] in [the holy Spirit]. This is the besealment."

This last text, text 33, is an incantation not against demons, but against people who would perform black magic. This ‘white magic’ was intended to counteract the curses of Apila, who apparently was trying to curse the client. As well there is a quote from the Hebrew Bible (Isaiah 6:3) which can be recognized at the end of the incantation.

An "Overturned" Text (Text 33)
Overturned, overturned is the earth. Overturned is the earth which is/was established. Overturned are all vows, curses, spells, cursing black-arts, (2) and evil knocking black-arts which are dwelling among these people - 'Apila the son of Mahlapta, his wife, his sons, and everything that he has. In the name of Hapki'el,' the angel (3) that overturns the curses, spells, and evil black-arts which they have worked against him. Do not prevail against the household of 'Apila the son of Mahlapta - and do not prevail against Hindu the daughter of (4) 'Ahata, from this day and this hour and forever. In the name of Hapki'el, Rahmi'el,2 Aqri'el,3 and Yazi'el4 shall you removes the judgment, the curse, and the knocking from 'Apila (5) the son of Mahlapta and Hindu the daughter of 'Ahata. In [the name of h]oly, holy, holy YHWH of Hosts. All the earth is filled with His glory.6 Amen. Amen. Selah. Hallelujah! I am acting for Your name.

That all being said and studied, we can determine that throughout the history of the religion of the Israelites, magic, incantation, and superstition has been a part of the belief system. There is textual evidence of magic being used in the Old Testament and the New Testament comparable to other Ancient Near Eastern religious uses of magic. As well, there is physical evidence that the Israelites utilized protective charms or amulets inscribed with various incantations used in an apotropaic function. Also, after the time of Christ, between 400-700 A.D., we see that there were Israelite ‘magicians’ who created and sold the magical incantation bowls utilizing aspects of Israelite religion, as well as Christian formulas (likely depending on the client) to create protective charms in the form of the bowls. It is my belief that the use of white magic and incantations has not ceased to be used within Christianity even up to the present day. I would like to now venture into an examination of our current Christian climate and see if there is any evidence of this magic within the current Christian sub-culture. As a preliminary note, I will be using examples that are not general to all Christians or applicable to all forms of Christianity. However, it is apparent through these rather specific examples, that there is a form of magic and incantation being used by Christians today, even if they themselves do not recognize it as such, or would classify it as something else.

One fairly obvious example of where one could say incantations are being used in the church is through varying healing ministries. There seems to always be some sort of popular healing ministry going on at any given point. When I was in high school, Dr. Neil Anderson and his Bondage Breaker books were all the rage. Today, it seems this has been reincarnated in the ELEL ministries. I don’t want to say that these ministries don’t help people, or that they are not useful or that God doesn’t use them, but what I do want to point out is the blatant use of formulaic incantations, and the superstition that is encouraged. The casting out of demons in the name of Jesus hearkens back to the New Testament formula used by the disciples which in turn is the same as the incantations used in the Ancient Near East.

As well, these ministries are very concerned with demons and evil being allowed a ‘foot-hold’ in one’s life which can result in bondage and general unhappiness. As a result, there is a great deal of demon hunting which occurs, and like the incantation bowls which try to bar all demons and evil using general statements, it seems that these ministries try to stop all demons and evil by not participating in anything that does not originate from Christianity. This is one area where I am particularly opinionated. It almost seems (and this is a very general statement) that anything that is not Christian, or is not understood, is feared, and not to be ‘dabbled in’. For example, any Chinese medicine should be avoided as it did not originate in a Christian country but has ‘roots’ in another religion. To me this just seems like alarmist fear mongering. To say that western medicine is okay because it originated in a Christian country is preposterous. The main argument that I’ve heard about Chinese medicine is that its power doesn’t come from God. Well, I hate to break it to people, but western medicine’s power doesn’t come from God either. Another concern I’ve heard about eastern medicine is their belief in life energy, or Qi. However, I fail to see how the existence of Qi undermines God’s power (who very well could have created it). As an interesting note, if you are interested in learning more about Qi and how they have done a scientific study to detect qi, see the following link to the Copper Wall Experiment. http://www.healthy.net/scr/interview.asp?Id=199

Another example is the idea that a demon could enter your house through some object. This object could really be anything. I remember wondering if I had anything in my house that had its origins in something non-Christian that was causing evil to enter my life. Again, this represents a belief in magic which was so common amongst other Ancient Near Eastern and pagan cultures.

Another example, which I hesitate to mention, but which I believe demonstrates the qualities of an incantation, is the sinner’s prayer. Here is an example of the sinner’s prayer.

“Heavenly Father, I know that I have sinned against you and that my sins separate me from you. I am truly sorry. I now want to turn away from my sinful past and turn to you for forgiveness. Please forgive me, and help me avoid sinning again. I believe that your Son, Jesus Christ, died for my sins, that He was raised from the dead, is alive, and hears my prayer. I invite Jesus to become my Savior and the Lord of my life, to rule and reign in my heart from this day forward. Please send your Holy Spirit to help me obey You and to convict me when I sin. I pledge to grow in grace and knowledge of you. My greatest purpose in life is to follow your example and do Your will for the rest of my life. In Jesus' name I pray, Amen.”

I realize that this is an oversimplification of salvation which I am about to portray, but please bear with that for the sake of the conversation. In order for a person to be saved, one must only say this prayer utilizing the right formula (confession, turning away, confession of belief, invitation to the Holy Spirit, all said in the name of Jesus). This type of formulaic prayer designed to obtain a specific result (in this case salvation) is, by definition, an incantation.

There also exists within the Abrahamic faiths the belief in the supernatural presence of God specific to locales which have an important role in the history of the religion. For example, it could be argued that in Christianity, Jerusalem holds a special place in the hearts of believers, and specifically locations in and around there such as Calvary, and Bethlehem. Although Christians do not confess specifically to the special presence of God at these places, it would be difficult for a Christian to perform a pilgrimage to these locations and not have a feeling of the special presence of God. The Jews have the ‘wailing wall, the Muslims have the temple on the mount. Catholicism is replete with pilgrimage locations in which the power of God is said to have a special presence (such as St. Joseph’s Oratory in Montreal where many go to seek healing). This idea of the special presence of God in holy places throughout the world is a practice that goes back to the Ancient Near Eastern idea of the deity having a special presence or power in the temple or statue.

Of course, this idea is not limited only to the Ancient Near East, but is a commonality in nearly all world religions. Joseph Campbell in his book, ‘The Hero With A Thousand Faces’ describes a phenomena amongst world mythologies which he describes as the world naval. It is the source through which the power of the universe is bestowed upon humanity. It could be a place, a person, or a thing. For Christianity it is Jesus, specifically his crucifixion and resurrection. As such, those places where these things occurred hold a special place in the hearts of believers.

The last thing example (and there are more and I’m sure these examples may have triggered other examples in your head that you will recognize as a form of magic, superstition, or incantation) is that of infant baptism or baby dedication (baby dedication being the Protestant way of doing the baptism without actually doing it so as not to anger God by being like those other guys). Both infant baptism and baby dedication essentially serve the same psychosomatic function. Again, this is an oversimplification, but infant baptism and dedication is a ritual essentially performed by the parents on behalf of the child who is not yet cognizant enough to beseech the favor of God. The parents, on behalf of the child, bring the child to God and dedicate the child to him. Having done so, it gives the parents a feeling of ease knowing that they have done what they can do, and commit in the future to bring the child up for God. And, at some level in the conscious or sub-conscious mind, the parent feels that if the child were to die before making the conscious decision to follow God, that the infant baptism or dedication will somehow influence God’s decision on their eternal fate. This could also be classified as a form of ritual, or magic, designed to invoke God’s protection upon the child, not only in this life, but in the life here-after.

Now comes the crux. It is obvious that magic, superstition, and incantation have been, and are a part of what we know as Christianity. Now, what does this matter for us? Is this a bad thing? Should all forms of white magic and superstition be banned from Christianity as we know it? I don’t think so. It really depends on what you believe about these issues, whether or not they are truly effective and whether or not you believe God requires their use in order to act? I think in some ways, these things can be harmful. I have already expressed my opinion on the alarmist fear mongering that goes on in some healing ministries which I feel is not healthy mentally. In other ways, these things can be very helpful. I for one really like liturgy, which can also be interpreted as a form of incantation in some respects. Prayer as well is necessary for Christians to feel connected with God and to ban prayer on account of it being incantation would be harmful. The various rituals which we utilize such as infant baptism and communion/Eucharist, are all effective ways of connecting with the divine. However, that being said, I also believe that it is important to study the history of these practices, to not be ignorant of the fact that they can be seen as magic or superstition even if we as Christians would not classify them that way. For unbelievers who look at us from the outside, it is no wonder they see a lot of hokus pokus going on comparable to many other ‘pagan’ religions. It is not surprising that many see Christianity as ‘just the same’ as all the other religions of the world. I personally see nothing wrong with utilizing these practices if it helps us to worship and come closer to God, but I do not want us to be delusional in thinking that just because something is “Christian”, it is unique and not unlike the magic, superstitions, and incantations of the pagan religions.

Sources:

The Bronze Serpent in the Israelite Cult Author(s): Karen Randolp Joines Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 87, No. 3 (Sep., 1968), pp. 245-256 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature

The Story of the Aramaic Magical Incantation Bowls Author(s): Charles D. Isbell Source: The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 41, No. 1 (Mar., 1978), pp. 5-16 Published by: The American Schools of Oriental Research

Two Ugaritic Serpent Charms Author(s): Michael C. Astour Source: Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Jan., 1968), pp. 13-36 Published by: The University of Chicago Press

Magical Terms in the Old Testament Author(s): Alfred Guillaume Source: Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, No. 2 (Apr., 1942), pp. 111-131 Published by: Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Dingir. s̆a. dib. ba Incantations Author(s): W. G. Lambert Source: Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Jul., 1974), pp. 267-322 Published by: The University of Chicago Press

By the Power of Beelzebub: An Aramaic Incantation Formula from Qumran (4Q560) Author(s): Douglas L. Penney and Michael O. Wise Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 113, No. 4 (Winter, 1994), pp. 627-650 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature

An Aramaean Magical Text in Hebrew from the Seventh Century B. C. Author(s): W. F. Albright Source: Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, No. 76 (Dec., 1939), pp. 5-11 Published by: The American Schools of Oriental Research

A Syriac Incantation Bowl with Christian Formula Author(s): James A. Montgomery Source: The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures, Vol. 34, No. 2 (Jan., 1918), pp. 137-139 Published by: The University of Chicago Press

Aramaic Magic Bowls Author(s): Edwin M. Yamauchi Source: Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 85, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1965), pp. 511- 523 Published by: American Oriental Society

The Amulets from Ketef Hinnom: A New Edition and Evaluation Author(s): Gabriel Barkay, Marilyn J. Lundberg, Andrew G. Vaughn, Bruce Zuckerman Source: Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, No. 334 (May, 2004), pp. 41-71 Published by: The American Schools of Oriental Research

Panel Discussion: "Magic in the Ancient World" by Fritz Graf Author(s): Sarah Iles Johnston, John G. Gager, Martha Himmelfarb, Marvin Meyer, Brian Schmidt, David Frankfurter, Fritz Graf Source: Numen, Vol. 46, No. 3 (1999), pp. 291-325 Published by: BRILL

An Angelic "Curse": Exodus 14:20 Author(s): E. A. Speiser Source: Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 80, No. 3 (Jul. - Sep., 1960), pp. 198- 200 Published by: American Oriental Society

A Hebrew Incantation against Night-Demons from Biblical Times Author(s): H. Torczyner Source: Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan., 1947), pp. 18-29 Published by: The University of Chicago Press

The Hero With A Thousand Faces; Joseph Campbell, New World Library, Novato, California, 2008

Before the Muses: an Anthology of Akkadian Literature, Benjamin R. Foster, CDL Press, Bethesda, Maryland, 2005










Thursday, May 28, 2009

Holy War and Genocide: A Merciful God?


The concept of a holy war is of course not foreign to our thought. Everyone is familiar with the crusades and the concept of Christians who believed God commanded them to destroy the infidel (aka Muslims). Hindsight is a wonderful thing as we look back and think, ‘how silly of them, how could they have done such awful things’. There has also been much controversy over the somewhat recent events which have taken place in Iraq (to the decimation of many archaeological sites, much to my chagrin). There are of course those people who are very much in support of the war and others who are violently opposed. There seems to be no middle ground. It is equally divided amongst Christians as well, with many of those who are for the war believing it to be a holy war with shouts of ‘God wills it!” However one must trust that the atrocities committed by those in the crusades were not repeated by the American war machine (or at least not shown on the Fox news).

This concept of God sanctioning war upon other countries is as old as the Bible itself. Yet if the President of the United States were to stand up in front of the country with a message from God saying that the American people were commanded to enter a foreign country and kill all who lived there- animals, men, women and children- and then to burn the country to the ground, even the most devout followers of the President would have to doubt that this message actually came from God. Rather the President would likely be ousted from office and deemed unfit to govern. But if we look at the Bible, particularly the book of Joshua, we see time and time again examples of God commanding this uncompromising genocide. If we as Christians are to believe that the Holy Spirit guides our sense of morality, and it is probably safe to say that 99.9% of Christians would agree that genocide is wrong, then how can we accept that our God, who never changes, commanded such things?

Let’s look at a few of the examples where this occurred in Joshua. The following refers to the battle of Jericho. Rahab alone is spared for assisting the spies, however the rest of those who dwelled in the city were not so lucky.

Joshua 6:21 21They utterly destroyed everything in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox and sheep and donkey, with the edge of the sword.

Here is another example with the city of Ai where again, all were destroyed.

Joshua 8:24 24Now when Israel had finished killing all the inhabitants of Ai in the field in the wilderness where they pursued them, and all of them were fallen by the edge of the sword until they were destroyed, then all Israel returned to Ai and struck it with the edge of the sword.
25All who fell that day, both men and women, were 12,000--all the people of Ai.
26For Joshua did not withdraw his hand with which he stretched out the javelin until he had utterly destroyed all the inhabitants of Ai.
27 Israel took only the cattle and the spoil of that city as plunder for themselves, according to the word of the LORD which He had commanded Joshua.
28So Joshua burned Ai and made it a heap forever, a desolation until this day.
29 He hanged the king of Ai on a tree until evening; and at sunset Joshua gave command and they took his body down from the tree and threw it at the entrance of the city gate, and raised over it a great heap of stones that stands to this day.

Here in Joshua 11, Yahweh commands specifically that all would be destroyed. It claims in fact that Yahweh himself was responsible for hardening the hearts of those nations in order to have them do battle with Israel.

Joshua 11
18Joshua waged war a long time with all these kings.
19There was not a city which made peace with the sons of Israel except the Hivites living in Gibeon; they took them all in battle.
20 For it was of the LORD to harden their hearts, to meet Israel in battle in order that he might utterly destroy them, that they might receive no mercy, but that he might destroy them, just as the LORD had commanded Moses.
In 1 Samuel 15 we find another example where Yahweh makes the command to commit genocide against a nation, specifically Amalek.
1 Samuel 15 - 1Then Samuel said to Saul, "The LORD sent me to anoint you as king over His people, over Israel; now therefore, listen to the words of the LORD.
2"Thus says the LORD of hosts, 'I will punish Amalek for what he did to Israel, how he set himself against him on the way while he was coming up from Egypt.
3'Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.'"

Where is the God of mercy and love that we as Christians know? If God never changes, if he is eternal and constant in his personality, then how can the God of love condone such things? If one takes these episodes as a literal, historical account of what occurred, then it follows that some sort of theological reckoning must take place in order to justify the actions of God. The first, which I believe to be the worst option, is to completely ignore these passages and shove them under the carpet and avoid bringing them up at Outreach Services or Alpha Conferences and hope that nobody brings it up on their Christian blogs (whoops). The other, more superior option is the literal point of view which basically says that God was punishing these nations for their immorality. This stems mainly from a passage in Leviticus 18.

1 The LORD said to Moses, 2 "Speak to the Israelites and say to them: 'I am the LORD your God. 3 You must not do as they do in Egypt, where you used to live, and you must not do as they do in the land of Canaan, where I am bringing you. Do not follow their practices. 4 You must obey my laws and be careful to follow my decrees. I am the LORD your God. 5 Keep my decrees and laws, for the man who obeys them will live by them. I am the LORD.
24 " 'Do not defile yourselves in any of these ways, because this is how the nations that I am going to drive out before you became defiled. 25 Even the land was defiled; so I punished it for its sin, and the land vomited out its inhabitants. 26 But you must keep my decrees and my laws. The native-born and the aliens living among you must not do any of these detestable things, 27 for all these things were done by the people who lived in the land before you, and the land became defiled. 28 And if you defile the land, it will vomit you out as it vomited out the nations that were before you.

This however does not account for the genocide of entire peoples, killing men, women and children. It merely speaks about, ‘vomiting out its inhabitants’, which does not necessarily infer genocide. As well, people who purport this view (God punishing the nations) go into great detail about communal sin and being punished as a community. Within this framework, all who live in a society that has become sinful are all sinful. God does not look at the individual, but at the community as a whole. As such, even the innocent (children, etc.) were punished alongside those who committed the actual immoral acts. However, this line of reasoning does not stand up to scrutiny if one takes into account other episodes in the Bible where God does indeed spare the innocent individual. Take for example the incident with Sodom and Gomorrah where God has decided to destroy the city for its wickedness. Abraham then pleads with God.

Genesis 18
20 Then the LORD said, "The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and their sin so grievous 21 that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. If not, I will know."
22 The men turned away and went toward Sodom, but Abraham remained standing before the LORD. 23 Then Abraham approached him and said: "Will you sweep away the righteous with the wicked? 24 What if there are fifty righteous people in the city? Will you really sweep it away and not spare the place for the sake of the fifty righteous people in it? 25 Far be it from you to do such a thing—to kill the righteous with the wicked, treating the righteous and the wicked alike. Far be it from you! Will not the Judge of all the earth do right?"
26 The LORD said, "If I find fifty righteous people in the city of Sodom, I will spare the whole place for their sake."
27 Then Abraham spoke up again: "Now that I have been so bold as to speak to the Lord, though I am nothing but dust and ashes, 28 what if the number of the righteous is five less than fifty? Will you destroy the whole city because of five people?" "If I find forty-five there," he said, "I will not destroy it."
29 Once again he spoke to him, "What if only forty are found there?" He said, "For the sake of forty, I will not do it."
30 Then he said, "May the Lord not be angry, but let me speak. What if only thirty can be found there?" He answered, "I will not do it if I find thirty there."
31 Abraham said, "Now that I have been so bold as to speak to the Lord, what if only twenty can be found there?" He said, "For the sake of twenty, I will not destroy it."
32 Then he said, "May the Lord not be angry, but let me speak just once more. What if only ten can be found there?" He answered, "For the sake of ten, I will not destroy it."

In this case we have the opposite communal effect where the city will not be destroyed because of the innocent. Of course we know later that God spares Lot and his family specifically and destroys the rest of the city. While it is true that throughout the Bible we do see God dealing with the Israelites as a community, there are also many examples where he regards the individual as important as well. In my opinion, justifying the genocide of the people of Canaan due to their immorality as a society and killing off the innocent along with the wicked requires more theological contortions than I am personally comfortable with. Rather, I subscribe to a rather different explanation of these slaughters.

Before I proceed, it is important to note that the historicity of Joshua and the conquest of Palestine is indeed in question. There is no archeological evidence for such a conquest being made by the Israelites in such a short period of time. Rather, there is a continuity of cultures throughout the late Bronze Age when this conquest was supposedly having taken place. What I mean by that is, archaeologically speaking, the material remains of the cultures in the region of Palestine and the Levant show no signs of a major change in occupation. If the Israelites did indeed conquer and destroy these cities and reoccupy the land, we would expect to find a break in the material remains. This does not exist. As well, although many cities were destroyed at varying times, and there is archaeological evidence of this, they were not all destroyed within the time frame allotted by the book of Joshua. In all likelihood, there was more of a gradual, general removal of certain tribes from under the ruling powers of the time who separated themselves. George Mendenhall puts it this way:

“The fact is, and the present writer would regard it as a fact though not every detail can be ‘proven,’ that both the Amarna materials and the biblical events represent politically the same process: namely, the withdrawal, not physically and geographically, but politically and subjectively, of large population groups from any obligation to the existing political regimes, and therefore, the re-nunciation of any protection from those sources. In other words, there was no statistically important invasion of Palestine at the beginning of the twelve tribe system of Israel. There was no radical displacement of population, there was no genocide, there was no large scale driving out of population, only of royal administrators (of necessity!). In summary, there was no real conquest of Palestine at all; what happened instead may be termed, from the point of view of the secular historian interested only in socio-political processes, a peasant's revolt against the network of interlocking Canaanite city states.”

If we follow that the conquest of Palestine never took place as described in Joshua, then it would stand to reason that the writer of Joshua had some sort of agenda in mind in describing these battles and commands of God. We may catch a glimpse of why these atrocities committed by the Israelites at the command of God were put forth by the author by taking a look at the practices of war among other Ancient Near Eastern cultures, in particular the Assyrians.

The Assyrian war machine was well known throughout the Ancient Near East and they were known for being quite brutal. There were no such things as war crimes in the Ancient Near East and nations were guarded by only their own sense of what was acceptable practice. The Assyrians were on the rampage, starting in 911 BCE until 612 BCE. The Assyrian empire had many famous kings, some of which will be familiar to Biblical students, such as Tiglath-Pileser, Ashurbanipal, Sargon II, Sennacherib and Esarhaddon. The might of the Assyrian Empire and their army was famous even amongst the authors of the Bible.

2 Kings 15:20
20 Menahem exacted this money from Israel. Every wealthy man had to contribute fifty shekels of silver to be given to the king of Assyria. So the king of Assyria withdrew and stayed in the land no longer.

2 Kings 15:29
29 In the time of Pekah king of Israel, Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria came and took Ijon, Abel Beth Maacah, Janoah, Kedesh and Hazor. He took Gilead and Galilee, including all the land of Naphtali, and deported the people to Assyria.

2 Kings 18
13 In the fourteenth year of King Hezekiah's reign, Sennacherib king of Assyria attacked all the fortified cities of Judah and captured them. 14 So Hezekiah king of Judah sent this message to the king of Assyria at Lachish: "I have done wrong. Withdraw from me, and I will pay whatever you demand of me." The king of Assyria exacted from Hezekiah king of Judah three hundred talents of silver and thirty talents of gold. 15 So Hezekiah gave him all the silver that was found in the temple of the LORD and in the treasuries of the royal palace.
16 At this time Hezekiah king of Judah stripped off the gold with which he had covered the doors and doorposts of the temple of the LORD, and gave it to the king of Assyria.

As has been demonstrated, the Assyrian Empire was one of great breadth and relied heavily upon the might of their army to keep their empire intact. The Assyrians didn’t have the best reputation when it came to their war practices as well. If we take a look at the Prism of Sennacherib (pictured below), we can see how he dealt with various revolts.
Column 3 8I approached Ekron and slew the governors and nobles 9who had rebelled, and 10hung their bodies on stakes around the city. The inhabitants 11who rebelled and treated (Assyria) lightly I counted as spoil. 12The rest of them, who were not guilty of rebellion 13and contempt, for whom there was no punishment, 14I declared their pardon. Padi, their king, 15I brought out to Jerusalem, 16set him on the royal throne over them, and 17imposed upon him my royal tribute.

Column 6 (against a Babylonian revolt)
2I cut their throats, 3and I cut off their precious lives like a string. Like the many waters 4of a storm, I made their gullets and entrails 5run down upon the wide earth. My prancing 6steeds harnessed for my riding plunged 7into the streams of their blood as (into) a river. The wheels of my war chariot, 8which brings the wicked and evil low, 9were spattered with blood and filth. With the bodies of their warriors 10I filled the plain like grass. Their testicles 11I cut off and tore out their privates like the seeds 12of cucumbers of Siwan. I cut off their hands. 13The heavy rings of brightest gold which were on their wrists 14I took away. With sharp swords 15I pierced their belts and took away 16the belt-daggars of gold and silver which were on their persons. The rest of his nobles, together with Nabû-shum-ishkun, 17son of Moerodach-baladan, who was frightened at my onslaught 18and had gone over to their side, my hands 19seized in the midst of the battle. The chariots and their horses, 20whose riders had been slain at the beginning of the terrible battle, 21and who had been left to themselves, 22kept running back and forth 23for two double-hours; I stopped their headlong flight. 24That Umman-menanu, king of Elam, 25together with the king of Babylon and the princes of Chaldea, 26who had gone over to their side, the terror of my battle 27overturned their bodies like a bull. They abandoned their tents; 28and to save their lives, they trampled 29the bodies of their soldiers; they fled like young pigeons 30that are pursued. Their hearts were torn; 31they held their urine, but let their dung go into their chariots. 32In pursuit of them, 33I dispatched my chariots and horses after them. 34Those among them who had escaped, who had fled for their lives, 35wherever they [the charioteers] met them, they cut them down with the sword.

In another inscription of Sennacherib, we find a vivid account of how he destroyed Babylon in a rage.

“As a hurricane proceeds, I attacked it and, like a storm, I overthrew it… Its inhabitants, young and old, I did not spare and with their corpses I filled the streets of the city… The town itself and its houses, from their foundations to their roofs I devastated, I destroyed, by fire I overthrew… In order that in future even the soil of its temples be forgotten, by water I ravaged it, I turned it into pastures. To quiet the heart of Ashur, my lord, that peoples should bow in submission before his exalted might, I removed the dust of Babylon for presents to the most distant peoples, and in that Temple of the New Year Festival I stored up some in a covered jar.”

On a side note, of interest as well are the differing accounts regarding the submission of Hezekiah and Israel to Assyria. In the Biblical account in 2 Kings 19, Yahweh delivers Jerusalem from the Assyrians. “35 That night the angel of the LORD went out and put to death a hundred and eighty-five thousand men in the Assyrian camp. When the people got up the next morning—there were all the dead bodies! 36 So Sennacherib king of Assyria broke camp and withdrew. He returned to Nineveh and stayed there.”

In the Assyrian account we find that Hezekiah did eventually submit to the yoke of Sennacherib.
18As for Hezekiah the Judahite, 19who did not submit to my yoke: forty-six of his strong, walled cities, as well as 20the small towns in their area, 21which were without number, by levelling with battering-rams 22and by bringing up seige-engines, and by attacking and storming on foot, 23by mines, tunnels, and breeches, I besieged and took them. 24200,150 people, great and small, male and female, 25horses, mules, asses, camels, 26cattle and sheep without number, I brought away from them 27and counted as spoil. (Hezekiah) himself, like a caged bird 28I shut up in Jerusalem, his royal city. 29I threw up earthworks against him— 30the one coming out of the city-gate, I turned back to his misery. 31His cities, which I had despoiled, I cut off from his land, and 32to Mitinti, king of Ashdod, 33Padi, king of Ekron, and Silli-bêl, 34king of Gaza, I gave (them). And thus I diminished his land. 35I added to the former tribute, 36and I lad upon him the surrender of their land and imposts—gifts for my majesty. 37As for Hezekiah, 38the terrifying splendor of my majesty overcame him, and 39the Arabs and his mercenary troops which he had brought in to strengthen 40Jerusalem, his royal city, 41deserted him. In addition to the thirty talents of gold and 42eight hundred talents of silver, gems, antimony, 43jewels, large carnelians, ivory-inlaid couches, 44ivory-inlaid chairs, elephant hides, elephant tusks, 45ebony, boxwood, all kinds of valuable treasures, 46as well as his daughters, his harem, his male and female 47musicians, which he had brought after me 48to Nineveh, my royal city. To pay tribute 49and to accept servitude, he dispatched his messengers.

Although it was common for the Assyrians to embellish their victories, it was also not uncommon for the Israelites to do the same. We may never know what really took place.

From the previous inscriptions of Sennacherib, the Assyrian king, it can be seen that such atrocities, not unlike what the Israelites claimed to have done in the book of Joshua, were quite common place. It is also interesting that the book of Joshua was very likely written in the 8th and 7th centuries BCE and perhaps later redacted during the exilic period. This would place the authorship of this book squarely in the midst of the reign of the Assyrian Empire. As we have already established, the Assyrians’ reputation would have no doubt been very familiar to the authors of Joshua. I believe that the genocidal tendencies within the conquest of Palestine and the incident in 1 Samuel, were no doubt written by the authors as a way of ‘competing’ with the Assyrian Empire. Perhaps, in a way, the authors admired the Assyrian empire and their army and within the book of Joshua sought to legitimize the past Israelite dominance within the Palestinian region through their might of arms. But what of God’s command to commit such things? Was this also common throughout the Ancient Near East?

The city of Mari has yielded to us the “Mari Prophetic Texts” which date to approximately between 1800-1700 BCE. Although these texts are not contemporary to the writing of the book of Joshua, they do provide insight into the origins of prophecy and its uses. In this case, I would like to provide a couple of examples where the gods, through prophecy, gave commands and favour in regards to military movements.

M.9714=AEM1/1, 192

1. [To Zimri-Lim]
2. [speak:Thus says Adad:]
3. [To your……]
4. I will return you….Your…
5. I have for you in the losses.
6. My strong weapons
7. I sent before you
8. And 7 nets I sent
9. To overwhelm the Elamites
10. From the fifteenth until the…
11. You will join the battle, and
Lines 12-14 are illegible
15. To Zimri-Lim
16. Speak: Thus says Ishtar of Ninet:
17. With my strong weapons
18. I will stand by you.

Here Zimri-Lim, the king of Mari, receives word from the god Adad, and the goddess Ishtar, that they will be his strong weapons, and tell him to ‘join the battle’. In this next prophecy, a promise from the gods, via a personal or city deity named Kititum (and a specific mention of the God Anu, the king of all the gods) is given to King IBal-pi-El regarding land and rule that is very reminiscent of the promise given to Joshua in Joshua 1:1-5.

FLP 1674

1. King Ibal-pi-El
2. Thus says Kititum:
3. The secrets of the gods
4. are set before me.
5. because the mention
6. of my name is constantly in your mouth,
7. The secrets of the gods
8. I keep on opening for you.
9. By the advice
10. of the gods (and) by the judgment
11. of Anu, the land
12. Is given to you
13. to rule.
14. The tooth?/shoe? Of the upper
15. and lower land you will loosen.
16. The treasure of the upper
17. and lower land you will amass?/redeem?.
18. Your economy will not diminish.
19. Wherever in the land your hand has reached, it will enjoy
20. the food of peace.
21. The foundations of your throne
22. I, Kititum,
23. will strengthen. A protective
24. spirit I have established for you.
25. Let your ear be attentive to me.


Kititum promises to be his protective spirit and gives him a promise of land in the same manner as Yahweh promises Joshua before his entrance into the land of Canaan. Although it is unclear as to what medium Yahweh used to communicate with Joshua (aside from the unusual incident with the commander of the army of Yahweh in Joshua 5:13-15, but that’s another topic altogether) these prophecies give us a comparable example of how a nation’s or a city’s deity would give commands and promises in regard to military expeditions. In fact, it was very common that the deity had to be first consulted through various means before any militant action was taken.

There are examples of the gods of Assyria giving their approval and aiding in battles which are contemporary with the writing of the book of Joshua. If we take a look at an example from an inscription of Sennacherib that was previously discussed above we can see this.

Prism of Sennacherib, column 1
10The god Assur, the great mountain, an unrivaled kinship 11has entrusted to me, and above all those 12who dwell in palaces, has made my weapons powerful. 13From the upper sea of the setting sun 14to the lower sea of the rising sun, 15he has brought the black-headed people in submission at my feet. 16And mighty kings feared my warfare, 17leaving their homes and 18flying alone, like the sidinnu, the bird of the cave, 19to some inaccessible place.

The account of Sargon’s 8th campaign in 718 BCE is replete with examples of how Assur, the deity of the Assyrian Empire, as well as other gods, gave their approval and power for Sargon to be able to accomplish his great victories.

“With the sublime strength of Assur my lord, with the power and might of Marduk and Nabu, my divine allies, with the firm assent of Shamash, the supreme judge of the gods, [Shamash being the god consulted via various forms of divination before a military expedition would occur. Here the firm assent of Shamash means that Sargon consulted Shamash before the expedition began and obtained favourable omens] who opened the way and provided protection for my army, with the greatness of Nergal, mightiest of the gods, who marched beside me and guarded my camp, I came through the land of Sumbi, a district between Mounts Nikippa and Upa, difficult mountains, having made a noble march that no one could resist through the lands of Urartu, Sikirte, the Mannaeans, Nairi-lands, and Musasir, like a terrifying, marauding lion!”

It is clear from these examples- the Mari prophetic texts, the Prism of Sennacherib, and the account of Sargon’s 8th campaign- that it was common place for the deity of a specific nation to become involved in military campaigns of the nation, giving their approval, protection, and even commands. Approval of the deity gave the king the political clout needed to carry on these military expeditions. In many cases, there may have even been somewhat of a power struggle between the temple (prophets, priests, etc) and the ruling powers. It is thought by many scholars that prophets would exert their divine influence over the king in order to achieve their own desired results, but this again is venturing off into a bigger topic.

It is my belief that under the premise that the conquest of Canaan never actually took place as written in the book of Joshua, that the author(s) of the book of Joshua had a particular agenda in mind while composing that particular book. It was written during a time when the sovereignty of Israel would have been threatened by the might of the Assyrian Empire so much so that they risked losing the very land in which they lived. The book of Joshua is a literary response to such a threat. It asserts that God gave this land to the Israelites and aided them in conquering it. The writers placed the garb of the Assyrian Army upon the Israelite Army in regard to their fame, the terror they invoked, and the atrocities they committed. These atrocities were not seen in the same light as we see them. They were viewed as an example of might and power, which is what the Israelites needed to feel they had in a time when their own power was being threatened. Thus, the problem of God commanding genocide and the killing of innocent people becomes a non-issue in this light, as most likely, these stories were a human invention, not God’s. Although some may be uncomfortable with this way of dealing with this issue as it puts a more human aspect upon the authorship of the Bible, it is, in my opinion, more realistic, and requires less theological dancing and back-pedaling than the alternative, ‘community punishment’ view.
Sources

Hezekiah's Reforms and the Revolt against Assyria Author(s): Oded Borowski Source: The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 58, No. 3 (Sep., 1995), pp. 148-155 Published by: The American Schools of Oriental Research

Religion and Power: Edited by Nicole Brisch, The Oriental Institue of the University of Chicago,Chicago Illanois, 2008


The Hebrew Conquest of Palestine Author(s): George E. Mendenhall Source: The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 25, No. 3 (Sep., 1962), pp. 66-87 Published by: The American Schools of Oriental Research

Archaeology and the Religions of Canaan and Israel, Beth Alpert Nakhai, American Schools of Oriental Research, Boston MA, 2001

Megiddo Strata I-V, John Albert Wilson and Thomas George Allan, University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL, 1939

Before The Muses: An Anthology of Akkadian Texts, Benjamin R. Foster, CDL Press, Bethesda Maryland, 2005.

The Bible and the Ancient Near East, J.J.M. Roberts, Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake Indiana, 2002.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

The Making of a Legend




Perhaps one of the most inspiring and enigmatic figures known in the Old Testament is Moses. His story, and that of the Exodus from Egypt, has been told in many varying mediums of communication including at least two Hollywood movies that I can think of. In this post I will be taking a closer look at the origins of this famous figure in the Bible. First, I would like to say that this post is based heavily upon primary sources which I have put directly into the body of the post. I realize that sometimes this can be some heavy reading, unfortunately for those of you who usually skip over these passages, I think it is important to slug your way through so that you can see for yourselves what they say and not simply take my word for it (and for those of you who continue to refuse, I will summarize).

The birth story of Moses is so well known that it is of little use repeating it here, yet for the sake of clarity, here it is.

Exodus 2
1 Now a man of the house of Levi married a Levite woman, 2 and she became pregnant and gave birth to a son. When she saw that he was a fine child, she hid him for three months. 3 But when she could hide him no longer, she got a papyrus basket for him and coated it with tar and pitch. Then she placed the child in it and put it among the reeds along the bank of the Nile. 4 His sister stood at a distance to see what would happen to him.
5 Then Pharaoh's daughter went down to the Nile to bathe, and her attendants were walking along the river bank. She saw the basket among the reeds and sent her slave girl to get it. 6 She opened it and saw the baby. He was crying, and she felt sorry for him. "This is one of the Hebrew babies," she said.
7 Then his sister asked Pharaoh's daughter, "Shall I go and get one of the Hebrew women to nurse the baby for you?"
8 "Yes, go," she answered. And the girl went and got the baby's mother. 9 Pharaoh's daughter said to her, "Take this baby and nurse him for me, and I will pay you." So the woman took the baby and nursed him. 10 When the child grew older, she took him to Pharaoh's daughter and he became her son. She named him Moses,
saying, "I drew him out of the water."

The image of Moses being placed into the basket and sent careening down the Nile is an image familiar to most people in this generation. Yet, was this story true? A closer look at some of the other literature of the Ancient Near East sheds some interesting light upon this legend.

The first story I would like to look at is the birth of Cyrus (576-530 BCE), the founder of the Persian Empire. He, like many others in the Ancient Near East, has an interesting tale of his birth and upbringing. Herodotus (a Greek historian c. 490-420 BCE) wrote regarding Cyrus origins in his classical work dubbed, ‘The Histories’.

Astyages, the king of Persia, had a daughter named Mandane who was married to Cambyes. One day, Astyages had a dream regarding his daughter. “This time it was that a vine grew from his daughter’s private parts and spread over Asia. As before, he told the interpreters about this dream, and then sent for his daughter, who was now pregnant. When she arrived, he kept her under strict watch, intending to make away with her child; for the fact was that the Magi had interpreted the dream to mean that his daughter’s son would usurp his throne. (Book 1, 108)”

Astyages then ordered his steward, Harpagus to keep an eye on Mandane, and when the child was born, he was to take it home and kill it. When the child was born, Harpagus took the child home but could not bring himself to kill it. So, he sent for one of the king’s herdsman, Mitradates, and ordered him to expose the child in the wild. “The king’s orders are that you must expose this infant in the wildest spot you know of amongst the hills, where it may soonest die. I am to tell you, moreover, that if you disobey and find some means of saving the child, the king will have you put to death in a way not pleasant to think of. I am commanded to see for myself that the child has been exposed. (Book 1, 110)”

Mitrades as well found it difficult to do away with the child and brought the baby home to his shack and spoke with his wife regarding the affair. His wife suggested an alternative. “‘My own child,’ she said, ‘was born today-and it was born dead. Take the body and expose it, and let us bring up Mandane’s son as our own. If we do this, no one will find out that you have disobeyed your masters. Moreover, we shall have managed pretty well for ourselves too: our dead baby will have a royal burial, and this live one will not be killed.’ (Book 1, 112)”

Thus it occurred that Cyrus was saved and brought up by the herdsmen until his true identity was later revealed and through a series of events which will not be discussed here, came to power.

This example of Cyrus reveals a common thread in the development of a hero, king, or leader in a community within the Ancient Near East. In this case, Cyrus, who was to be king, was saved as an infant through some rather extreme circumstances from being killed by the ruler of the time who believed him to be a threat. The boy was then raised in a home other than his own, until he discovered his true identity. He grew up to be the powerful ruler of the Persian Empire known as Cyrus the Great. Although the parallels to Moses are not exactly the same, the general situation is remarkably similar.

Next we will examine the famous legend of Romulus, the traditional founder of the Roman Empire. His birth story, as related by Plutarch (a roman historian, 46-100 AD) is very similar to that of Cyrus. Amulius was the king of Alba and had taken the kingship from his brother. He feared that his brother’s daughter would have a son and this son would take his kingdom away. As such, he made her a priestess of Vesta, which bound her to a life of celibacy. However, she did indeed become pregnant. The punishment for this was death, but the king’s daughter, Antho, interceded on her behalf and she was spared. However she was kept under constant vigil so that the boy would be destroyed upon birth.

“Delivered she was of two boys, and their size and beauty were more than human. 4 Wherefore Amulius was all the more afraid, and ordered a servant to take the boys and cast them away. This servant's name was Faustulus, according to some, but others give this name to the man who took the boys up. Obeying the king's orders, the servant put the babes into a trough and went down towards the river, purposing to cast them in; but when he saw that the stream was much swollen and violent, he was afraid to go close up to it, and setting his burden now near the bank, went his way. 5 Then the overflow of the swollen river took and bore up the trough, floating it gently along, and carried it down to a fairly smooth spot which is now called Kermalus, but formerly Germanus, perhaps because brothers are called "germani."
4 Now there was a wild fig-tree hard by, which they called Ruminalis, either from Romulus, as is generally thought, or because cud-chewing, or ruminating, animals spent the noon-tide there for the sake of the shade, or best of all, from the suckling of the babes there; for the ancient Romans called the teat "ruma," and a certain goddess, who is thought to preside over the rearing of young children, is still called Rumilia, in sacrificing to whom no wine is used, and libations of milk are poured over her victims. 2 Here, then, the babes lay, and the she-wolf of story here gave them suck, and a woodpecker came to help in feeding them and to watch over them.”
………….
6 As for the babes, they were taken up and reared by Faustulus, a swineherd of Amulius, and no man knew of it; or, as some say with a closer approach to probability, Numitor did know of it, and secretly aided the foster-parents in their task.

In this case it is twin boys who are exposed to the wild and left to die for the same reason Cyrus was; the king feared that they would take over his kingdom. Again the future ruler is saved, in this case miraculously by some she-wolves who then took and nursed the babies. Plutarch himself acknowledges that likely this is a fantastical embellishment of the truth and that probably they were saved by other less magnificent means. It is apparent from this example of Romulus as well, which is very close to that of Cyrus, stories of miraculous rescues of babies from a nervous and somewhat paranoid ruler were not uncommon.

Our last ‘hero’ we will be looking at is Sargon the Great. Sargon was the first Semitic King to conquer the Sumerian city states and to create what could be called the first Empire of Mesopotamia from roughly 2270-2215 BCE, long before Moses was even a twinkle in his father's eye. There are two texts which I will present here. The first is in Sumerian and was written somewhere between 1800 and 2000 BCE. It is a portrayal of how Sargon gained control over the city ruled by Ur-Zababa, presumably Kish. The tablet is a difficult read and is fragmented as well. I have provided the translation below, but I will summarize it in order to aid in the reading.
In this text, Sargon is the cupbearer of Ur-Zababa. During his time in this position, Ur-Zababa has a dream which he assumes means that Sargon will take his kingdom. Sargon as well has a dream confirming Ur-Zababa’s suspicions. Ur-Zababa then decides to have Sargon killed by sending him with a letter to Belish-tikal ordering Belish-tikal, upon receiving the letter, to kill Sargon by means of ‘throwing him into the mould like statues’. Inana intervenes and warns Sargon not to enter the house. Thus Sargon lives. Ur-Zababa tries to have Sargon killed a second time, but is unsuccessful (we do not know exactly what happened due to fragmentation of the tablet). The last part of the tablet is extremely fragmented and broken off but it is apparently describing some type of conflict between Sargon and Ur-Zababa. The Sumerian King list tells us that Sargon did eventually take control of Kish (although he took it not from Ur-Zababa, but from Unug).

Segment B
1-7. One day, after the evening had arrived and Sargon had brought the regular deliveries to the palace, Ur-Zababa was sleeping (and dreaming) in the holy bed-chamber, his holy residence. He realised what the dream was about, but did not put into words, did not discuss it with anyone. After Sargon had received the regular deliveries for the palace, Ur-Zababa appointed him cupbearer, putting him in charge of the drinks cupboard. Holy Inana did not cease to stand by him.
8-11. After five or 10 days had passed, King Ur-Zababa …… and became frightened in his residence. Like a lion he urinated, sprinkling his legs, and the urine contained blood and pus. He was troubled, he was disturbed like a fish living in brackish water.
12-24. It was then that the cupbearer of Ezina's wine-house, Sargon, lay down not to sleep, but lay down to dream. In the dream, holy Inana drowned Ur-Zababa in a river of blood. The sleeping Sargon groaned and gnawed the ground. When King Ur-Zababa heard about this groaning, he was brought into the king's holy presence, Sargon was brought into the presence of Ur-Zababa (who said:) "Cupbearer, was a dream revealed to you in the night?" Sargon answered his king: "My king, this is my dream, which I will tell you about: There was a young woman who was as high as the heavens and as broad as the earth. She was firmly set as the base of a wall. For me, she drowned you in a great river, a river of blood."
25-34. Ur-Zababa chewed his lips, he became seriously afraid. He spoke to ……, his chancellor: "My royal sister, holy Inana, is going to change (?) my finger into a …… of blood; she will drown Sargon, the cupbearer, in the great river. Beliš-tikal, chief smith, man of my choosing, who can write tablets, I will give you orders, let my orders be carried out! Let my advice be followed! Now then, when the cupbearer has delivered my bronze hand-mirror (?) to you, in the E-sikil, the fated house, throw them (the mirror and Sargon) into the mould like statues."
35-45. Beliš-tikal heeded his king's words and prepared the moulds in the E-sikil, the fated house. The king spoke to Sargon: "Go and deliver my bronze hand-mirror (?) to the chief smith!" Sargon left the palace of Ur-Zababa. Holy Inana, however, did not cease to stand at his right hand side, and before he had come within five or 10 nindan of the E-sikil, the fated house, holy Inana turned around toward him and blocked his way, (saying:) "The E-sikil is a holy house! No one polluted with blood should enter it!" Thus he met the chief smith of the king only at the gate of the fated house. After he delivered the king's bronze hand-mirror (?) to the chief smith, Beliš-tikal, the chief smith, …… and threw it into the mould like statues.
46-52. After five or 10 days had passed, Sargon came into the presence of Ur-Zababa, his king; he came into the palace, firmly founded like a great mountain. King Ur-Zababa …… and became frightened in his residence. He realised what was it about, but did not put into words, did not discuss it with anyone. Ur-Zababa became frightened in the bed-chamber, his holy residence. He realised what was it about, but did not put into words, did not discuss it with anyone.
53-56. In those days, although writing words on tablets existed, putting tablets into envelopes did not yet exist. King Ur-Zababa despatched Sargon, the creature of the gods, to Lugal-zage-si in Unug with a message written on clay, which was about murdering Sargon. unknown no. of lines missing
Segment C
1-7. With the wife of Lugal-zage-si ……. She (?) …… her feminity as a shelter. Lugal-zage-si did not …… the envoy. "Come! He directed his steps to brick-built E-ana!" Lugal-zage-si did not grasp it, he did not talk to the envoy. But as soon as he did talk to the envoy ……. The lord said "Alas!" and sat in the dust.
8-12. Lugal-zage-si replied to the envoy: "Envoy, Sargon does not yield."After he has submitted,Sargon …… Lugal-zage-si ……. Sargon …… Lugal-zage-si ……. Why …… Sargon ……?

In this story we see briefly how Sargon, from relatively humble beginnings, was able to establish the first Semitic Empire. Likely there are some embellishments to this story which helped to show Sargon in a more heroic light. In the Sumerian King list, it is emphasized that Sargon was the son of a gardener, which is somewhat out of place from the rest of the document which is very rigid in format
.


266-296. In Agade, Sargon, whose father was a gardener, the cupbearer of Ur-Zababa, became king, the king of Agade,

It is obvious again that Sargon, being a very important figure in the Mesopotamian culture, was given the typical rags to riches story (perhaps truthfully, or perhaps not).

Our last legend that we will take a look at is perhaps the most striking of the ones we have looked at, especially when compared to the birth story of Moses. It is the birth story of Sargon. This tablet was written somewhere between 700-1000 BCE.

I am Sargon the great king, king of Agade.
My mother was a high priestess, I did not know my father.
My father’s brother dwells in the uplands.
My city is Azupiranu, which lies on Euphrates bank.
My mother, the priestess, conceived me,
She bore me in secret.
She placed me in a reed basket,
She sealed my hatch with pitch.
She left me to the river, whence I could not come up.
The river carried me off, it brought me to Aqqi,
Drawer of water.
Aqqi, drawer of water, brought me up as he dipped his bucket.
Aqqi, drawer of water, raised me as his adopted son.
Aqqi, drawer of water, set (me) to his orchard work.
During my orchard work, Ishtar loved me.
Fifty-four years I ruled as king,
I became lord over and ruled the people of this land,
………….

It is within this legend we find the strongest parallel to that of Moses. Sargon’s mother was a high priestess, and thus, like the mother of Romulus, was forbidden to have children due to her vocation. This is the reason why when she bore Sargon, she did so in secret and then proceeded to place him in a reed basket and sealed it with hatch and pitch (which is almost the identical construction of the basket which bore Moses on his rocky trip down the Nile) and set him in the Euphrates River. The oldest copy of this legend of Sargon we have was written approximately 1500 years after his death, thus, it is generally thought among Assyriologists that this is not an historical account of Sargon’s birth, but was likely composed by Sargon I or Sargon II during their reigns as a way of making their ancestor more glorious and thus legitimizing their reign and increasing their power in the eyes of their subjects and enemies.

As for the composition of Exodus, there are basically two camps. The first is that Exodus was written by Moses himself which would date its writing to around 1400 BCE. The second opinion, which is the one I tend to side with, was that the book of Exodus was likely written by several authors and then put together later by a separate redactor. The final composition was then put together somewhere during the exilic or post-exilic period (approx. 500-300 BCE). One of the reasons I tend to lean towards the later dating has to do with the information we explored above. Like their Mesopotamian neighbours, the birth of Moses and his upbringing was likely written long after his death and changed and bolstered to turn him into a greater hero. Giving him a miraculous birth and rescue was almost a way of legitimizing his leadership and his anointing by God.

The historicity of the Bible is one that is often discussed and I have made my opinions known regarding the reliability of Genesis and particularly the first few chapters. As is already obvious, I believe that stories such as the creation, the flood, and the nephilim were myths that were designed to teach us something about God. As we examine the birth of Moses, the term myth does not really apply. I believe that Moses did exist, which discounts any use of the term myth. Rather, I prefer to apply the term legend, or folk-history as Robert Drews has done in his article, “Sargon, Cyrus, and Mesopotamian Folk History”. The legend of Sargon that we read above was written long after he lived and is not believed to be historically accurate. Yet, we as human beings have a tendency to elevate those people in the past who did great things (in Sargon’s case, he created the first Semitic Empire). In order to do that, there are certain ideas and motifs that often apply within a culture that help to elevate a person to the status of legend. In the cases of Sargon, Cyrus, Romulus, and Moses, the theme of ‘rags to riches,’ a motif which was used incredibly often to create a hero, was used. Although the births of Sargon and Moses offer a very clear example of syncretism between the two cultures, the rags to riches theme in general is found throughout the Bible (Joseph, Moses, David, just to name a few).

Of course we enter the slippery slope so often talked about among evangelicals. If the birth of Moses isn’t historically accurate, then how can we know if any of the Bible is accurate? Did the Exodus happen? If none of that stuff happened, how can I possibly have a Christian faith? It is true that we can likely never know for sure exactly how historically accurate the Bible is. There are many Christians who make it their mission to try and prove the historicity of the Bible in a vain effort to preserve a faith based on a perception that the Bible must be perfect in historical and scientific accuracy. It is my personal opinion that there are many aspects of the Bible which reflect the history of Israel in a way that can be trusted. However, I also believe that there are some embellishments, and perhaps some of their great leaders over many centuries became not just people, but legends. Therefore, to have a legend, there must be certain aspects which must be applied to that person. In Moses' case, the common Ancient Near Eastern motif of rags to riches was applied.

It is much easier to build a Christian faith with your mind open to the fact that the Bible is not historically accurate and was edited and composed with the agenda of the author than it is to try and build a faith on the historical accuracy of the Bible. Those who try to prove its historicity will ultimately fail. Those who accept the Bible with its flaws, although their faith may look differently than the fundamentalist, will, in the end, have a version of Christianity no less valid, and no less strong, than those who base their faith on accuracy.